Saturday, December 26, 2009

Union Break!

Bags given away: 3 1/2 (plus three coats)

Bags of trash: 2

Boxes: 21 (5 of which actually belong to me :p)

Stores aware of my endless need for boxes: 3

Getting ready to put stuff on Freecycle (three pieces of furniture plus a set of glasses), so we'll see how that goes. Tomorrow, unless we have a weather incident, we're going to Indianapolis for a few days and then down to Louisville for a few days. Then we'll be back just after the new year ... to pack more boxes!

Sadly, I'm actually not looking forward to packing home more loot, as I think the majority of our Xmas presents are actually in those two cities. Sigh.

-- DV

Thursday, December 24, 2009

Bags given away: 3 1/2, plus three coats given to teenager who lives down the block

Bags of trash: 2

Boxes: 15

Sneezes: Endless

Hope: Waning

Not done by a long shot. Ten of those boxes were books that belong to Navy Buddy, who is being released from the Navy at the end of January and cannot pick them up until then. The movers want us to label boxes according to what room they go in, so I'm putting his initial on his boxes of things so that I know not to unpack them. I'll probably have at least five more boxes of his books before we're done -- and all that is after I thinned out what he brought to me, which sometimes included three copies of the same damn book. Two of the boxes were Dante's books out of his bedroom, one box came out of our own library and one box was full of magazines that I cannot bear to part with (fashion! sigh!). The other box has electronics and video games in it.

Then I quit for a while. So what's been cleared out? A corner of the entertainment center, the space underneath a side table, one large bookcase, a small hutch, the stacks of books on Dante's bed (has a shelf for them) and Dante's tiny closet. At this rate we'll never get moved out, at least not until NEXT Christmas! My moving date is January 8. I'm really considering not going to visit people next week as we'd planned in favor of just packing and packing and packing and packing .....

The bags of trash were mostly broken odds and ends out of the recesses of and secret trash hidey-holes in Dante's bedroom. It's a tiny bedroom, but I still got two trash bags' worth of tiny, broken bits of junk. Where on earth does he FIND such things?! We sure don't buy him anything like that. For those interested in finding boxes, if you go to your local grocery store in the morning when the delivery trucks have gotten there, they'll usually let you cart away all the boxes you want. Even if they have already broken the boxes down, you can still tape them back together.

Oh, and JP, I saw that you called. I'm not avoiding you. I'm just traumatized.

-- DV

Wednesday, December 16, 2009

Boxing Count...

... the kind where you put stuff into them to be moved or given away rather than what happens when you hit the canvas in a ring.

In the grand moving experience, we're just now starting to bag, box and pack things up. I think I'm going to keep a running tab of all the crap we have that we move or give away.

Today, we took 3 1/2 bags of clothes, winter coats and shoes (including a pair of roller skates) to Goodwill. I didn't have time to freecycle, but I'll be doing that at the beginning of next week. I'm planning on asking the freecycle community for boxes just after Xmas!

-- DV

Bag count: 3 1/2 given away

Monday, December 14, 2009

A Prize for Bad Writing

... I won one! :D

But it wasn't my bad writing, it was that of one of my students. At the department party, we could enter a line from student writing we thought was particularly bad and win a prize. The prize turned out to be a bunch of homemade fudge, so thanks bad student writer!

Here was the line:

"When I write, I just can't help but to spill a little bit of myself onto the page."


EW. Do you need a tissue when you write your essay? Hand sanitizer, please.

-- DV

Friday, December 11, 2009

It's the Most Hectic-al Time of the Year

Today was the last official day of class, and all student work was turned in today. I'll likely also be receiving online work up until midnight. On top of that, we're trying to close on the house, and that has been anxiety provoking -- for the sellers more so than for us.

We're buying from friends -- yes, I know, everyone just go ahead and let out a collective gasp right now and get it over with. And we haven't quibbled on the price or on the other negotiations about the house. But she (there's a she and a he as sellers) is a nervous wreck because she's also trying to close on a house where they're moving to. Why they took all that on at once instead of renting for a few months or even a full year in their new area is beyond me, but that's not my decision and my life. She's really pushed us to hurry, hurry, hurry, sign this, do that, and El Hijo and I have had to pump the brakes a little bit just so we can make sure we're not doing something stupid. The he seller is much calmer. The she seller tried my patience quite a bit today, to the point where I was actually dodging her phone calls and she's a good friend of mine. She just emailed me constantly and called the office two or three times in about a 20 - 30 minute time span, wanting us to hurry up right now irrespective of the fact that it's the last day of classes and we have a crap ton of stuff to do and rush over to her place so we could do something to the contract that we didn't need to do. I called my loan officer and a family member who worked in the legal field, found out we didn't have to do what she wanted at all, and pumped the brakes a little more and she got kind of pissy with me. I know she's anxious, but I don't need help being anxious as I do that just fine on my own, so I'd rather keep the stress to a minimum, especially at this time of year.

The banking/loan process has actually gone surprisingly smoothly. I'm not sure what sort of hassle I expected, but whatever it was it didn't meet my expectations for how much trouble this was going to be. We both ended up with really good credit, which was also a surprise to me, and so we're basically in the in-between phase right now where we've signed the contract and completed the house inspection but the appraisal and legal paperwork isn't finished yet. So, we wait. Which is driving the she seller crazy, but I'm actually OK with waiting. We'll probably close the first week of January and that's also probably when we'll move. I can't believe we're actually about to own our first (only?) house. What's really good (and sort of sad if you think about it) is that even with a mortgage that includes a home insurance hazard policy and property taxes held in escrow, we're still paying less per month than the rent we're paying here for less (and worse) space. And their utility bills are literally about a third of what ours are, because this apartment is exceptionally drafty and poorly insulated -- all of the window seals are compromised. So we're actually saving lots of money by moving. I find that hard to wrap my head around.

I'll have a yard I can garden the heck out of. The house includes the little lot it sits on and a city lot and a half right beside of it, so we have some decent space. Prepare to see more blogs about permaculture and intensive gardening.

I've also discovered Freecycle. It's like a Craig's List, but instead of selling stuff, it's got to be free. You sign up for whatever area you want, and you can list things that you want to get rid of or things you need. I'm going to try to get my moving boxes that way, and I have several things I'd like to get rid of as well. Things seem to move fast on Freecycle! We'll see how it works. The best part is, people come and get it from you (you can set it outside or meet downtown, too, they don't have to go in your house or even meet you face to face), so you don't have to lug it away.

Oh, and I noticed that Christmas was freaking right around the corner.

Dante is going to Florida for Xmas this year; I'm not sure we're going anywhere, especially if there is a chance we might come in for a meeting during the week after Xmas. I still have one extended shopping session left, and then I need to wrap and mail stuff out.

At some point, I'll have to figure out when I'm prepping for my courses for the Spring. Lots of little odds and ends left to do.

Hearing the refrain "It's the mooost wonderful tiiiiime of the year ..." seems like sarcasm to me right now.

-- DV

Monday, December 07, 2009

Moving Notes

In taking stock of all the things that need moved in a few weeks, I've cleared out papers and gone through coats, shoes and furniture that can be given away. Having to pack it all out is a great motivator to go through and get rid of things. And I have made an obvious observation: we have a LOT of books.

Apart from the bathroom, into which we haul our magazines and books, every room in our house is going to require boxes to pack out books. The kitchen has enough cookbooks in it to necessitate its own box or two. Dante's bed comes with a built in bookcase and shelf -- both of which are filled with books. He has books in another hutch in his room. We have two bookcases worth in our own bedroom. And the library goes without saying. The living room has an antique bookcase full of books, plus a bookcase/lampstand thingy from Pier 1 that holds books on each side.

We have everything from graphic novels and art books to books about Revolutionary America and literary theory. There are Spanish and Italian language books, workbooks and other types of books in the language. Nature books, books on science, books on religion, religious books, trashy novels, biographies, modern fiction, ancient fiction, books on social problems, economics textbooks, photo albums.

Ye gods but we have books.

I've realized with horror and awe that books are going to be the things we endlessly pack. Cleaning out the rest of the rooms isn't going to be nearly as bad as packing and unpacking and sorting all those damned books.

-- DV

Saturday, December 05, 2009

Make Them Reminisce

So earlier I mentioned that my mother had a subscription to Reminisce magazine. It's the perfect fit for her, as pretty much all she enjoys talking about is the past. The magazine deals with memories and events from the 1920s - 1950s and has many sections almost solely devoted to people writing in and talking about the past. I'm sure this is actually a beneficial service to humanity, since that generation is talking amongst itself about how they all walked uphill in the snow both ways to the one room school house rather than barraging their children and grandchildren with those stories.

Not that the magazine isn't interesting -- it really is. There are sections about how people dealt with and experienced World War 2 or the Great Depression. The photos are incredible -- there was one that sticks out in my mind of a teenage girl in a pink dress made from flour sacks; you wouldn't know by looking. There are recipes for the food of that era. The advertisements and propaganda are fascinating. There is an upcoming section on remedies of the past that people are glad stayed in the past (like having to drink cod liver oil, for example).

It's also a reminder to us younger folks (like me, thank you very much) that there were a great deal of skills that used to exist in the past that are no longer with us, for good or for bad. My generation usually has to search online for ways of making ice cream by hand, for example. I can't sew for shit (except for buttons, I can put those back on) -- I considered it a useless skill given the changes in manufacturing. I can't can tomatoes or pickle cucumbers. I could figure out how -- but ...

... it's also a reminder that the lives we've evolved into don't really allow us to practice those sorts of skills anymore, again, for good or for bad. We have to carve out space and time to devote to canning, which is a long and involved process. And hot. At least what I remember of my mother doing it. And based on what I know now, I'm not sure I want to be responsible for poisoning other people with my canned goods that might really be canned "bads." I don't have time to make clothes for Dante from scratch. I like gardening, but I grew up on a farm in the mountains, and I know just how much work goes into raising a big garden, one that does more than provide the occasional salad. It's neat that milkmen used to put the bottled milk at your door in the morning like newspaper delivery -- but I'm glad I can run to the store and get milk whenever I need it. The original "ice box" is a beautiful and effective cabinet (basically). But I would hate to have to plan on meeting the ice man to get it restocked so the food didn't spoil.

The magazine seems to dwell almost exclusively on a certain way of remembering. Its tag line is "The magazine that brings back the good times." So that should tell you right there it's about glossing the past and remembering what you liked while conveniently overlooking the bad parts about the past. There aren't any stories about mothers who had to be given their "pin money" for the week as an allowance; no stories about how difficult it was for Mom to go into business by herself in the first place. No comments about how the lack of technology and the cultural mindset actually necessitated having someone at home to make sure the mending and cooking and cleaning happened. All mothers in this magazine happily baked pies and cookies and whatevers for their little darlings who wore clothes made from cloth from the general store that Mom also had made from scratch. A nice idea. But certainly a very purposefully exclusive way of remembering the past.

I also made an interesting observation in the five issues I thumbed through over Thanksgiving break, which covered around a year's worth of contributions. There are very few black people in Reminisce magazine. Much less Asians or Hispanics. I think it probably ought to be renamed White People Remember Life Without Minorities. The current issue has an article called "Neighborly Fun: The Jewish family next door kept things interesting." So clearly, the magazine is not for reminiscing about being Jewish in the 1920s - 1950s, but rather having experienced being around Jews during that time.

Those histories would likely look quite different. Black readers would likely tell stories of mom going away to do the cooking and baking and washing and sewing at white folks' homes, then coming back to their own kids and having to do it all over again. They would tell stories of fathers who got paid less for the same work, if they could find work at all. They would talk about Jim Crow laws. Most immigrants and non "white" residents (as it was defined at the time) in urban areas would tell stories of overcrowding in poor housing, being charged exorbitant rent for a dirty space, being pushed into meat packing or sewing industries where labor standards were nonexistent, or being pushed into certain neighborhoods and ghettoes -- that would apply to Jewish families and Irish families and Polish families and black families and people other than "WASPs", depending on the year; war remembrances would include the German-American rallies in the US hailing (heiling?) support for Hitler. And so on.

And so I always come away with mixed feelings when I look at those magazines or people's representations of their own history. El Hijo's father was on a tear this Thanksgiving about his grandmother's bread & butter pickles and the way life was back then. He was going on about how the (black) woman who came and cleaned for his mother was from a family of fantastic cooks. He went on and on about what great cooks they were, and how that's what they did around town and how famous they were for it. While that's true, neither El Hijo nor I had the heart to raise the issue of whether they had any choice in the matter. Was there any other kind of work available to them in Harlan County, Kentucky? Would the court house have hired them on in the late 1930s? Could they have gone and worked for the lawyers in the area? Could they have gone to school and gotten a degree and opened up a practice in town as a black doctor? Did he know any black woman who did work around town other than clean or cook -- for white people? It's hard sometimes to hear someone go on about what a "great" time that was without thinking, "Yeah -- for you!"

As a nation, we have "white bias" constantly in our remembering of things. I'm all for remembering bottled milk and looking at photos and hearing stories. Sometimes it just seems that the stories we want to hear and print are those that conveniently overlook the nasty parts of the past that we'd rather just as soon forget. It certainly is worth remembering, though, that one of the reasons we moved past those activities is because life got a lot more expensive. A college student used to be able to work summers and weekends and completely pay for school. Now that same student would have to work 50 hours a week all year long to pay for school. The cost of everything from milk and eggs to cars and homes has outpaced wages consistently since the early 1970s. It is very difficult for the average family to live on one person's salary, even for the cost conscious. It's difficult to fund retirement and pay for college (which more people have to have now in order to get jobs that used to be considered educated enough at the high school level) on one salary that also has to care for a mortgage, food, utilities, etc. And as our lives changed, so did our advertising, so that now we think some things are necessary that really aren't or that we did just fine without earlier.

It's worth stopping and thinking from time to time about the lifestyles we've decided to embrace. Do we need new technological gadgets every year? Why don't we have machines that last ten to fifteen years instead of ones that seem to break down every one to three years? Do we really need that much house? That much car? How many cars? Should we really be buying that prepacked prepared frozen dinner crap? When was the last time we all had dinner together? When was the last time we read the paper and just listened to the radio? How often and for how long is the TV on? How many more of our friends are IRL or simply on AOL?

Flashbacks are worth the modern day reality check -- even if sometimes our memories are selective.

-- DV

Wednesday, December 02, 2009

On War and Sacrifice

Maybe I've been supremely affected by reading my mother's Reminisce magazines over Thanksgiving Break, which I have a post about coming up shortly, but one of the featured sections got me to thinking, especially after hearing the President's speech last night about sending 30,000 more troops to Afghanistan.

The magazine usually features some sort of war-time memory section, and in it people, well, reminisce about what life was like during World War 2 (and sometimes Korea, but mostly WW2). It's actually pretty interesting reading about how people dealt with shortages of food, the alternate ways parents made food to deal with ingredients that were now being shipped to the front, rationing and how stamps were used to pay for things, how they came together as a community and helped returning soldiers, etc. In short, it was about dealing with sacrifice.

And so El Hijo and I were watching the speech last night and we came to the conclusion that what's really wrong here is that as a people, we're not being asked to sacrifice anything for this war. I'm not a fan of taxing in general nor of shortages. Nor of war, actually. But because we've evolved as a society so that we can have our butter, pantyhose, gas for the car and feed and equip soldiers too, war has gotten mighty impersonal. Unless you have a friend or family member enlisted and serving, there really aren't any reminders to you that we are at war until you turn on the news or read the papers.

If we are going to go to war, then we should feel it as a nation. We ought to be reminded that the reason you can't buy as much meat as you could before is due to the fact that it's being shipped to bases for American troops. We should realize that the reason we're forced to carpool to work is because of gas rationing. When we saw the line item for a war tax in our pay stubs, we'd know that was money we were sacrificing for the war effort.

And I'm quite sure that we wouldn't like it.

If we had done without much butter and meat for eight years, how angry would we be that 30,000 new troops were being deployed to Afghanistan? How angry would we have been as a people years ago when our government opened up a second war in Iraq which then drug on and on for years? Just how long would either of those wars actually continued if all of us had been sacrificing this whole time to pay for the war and feed and clothe the soldiers? I doubt it would've lasted for eight years. When we found out Haliburton was fleecing our government in Iraq, we would've probably been livid -- because we would've felt personally mugged if we had been paying a war tax that a crooked company profiteered off of. And that's what it would've been considered -- war profiteering. We don't hear about that term now, but war profiteering fired people up in the 1940s because while the average person sacrificed to accommodate a war effort, a few people took advantage of the situation to create their own wealth or resist an increase in corporate taxes. If we had been giving a percentage of our paycheck for four years to wage war and then we learned Haliburton executives pocketed lots of it, the public would've demanded swift action -- and they would've gotten it.

Instead, because we're divorced from the realities of war and we bear no personal cost, we can afford to shake our heads as if to say, "Well, that's how the world works." If we were forced to pay for it, we would demand war that was waged for the "right" reasons and as effectively and swiftly as possible. People by nature are pain-avoiders. Most species are. We seek to avoid pain. So, if war were painful to our wallets, our refrigerators and our way of life more generally, we would only wage war we really thought we should support. WW2 is a great example, because even in the face of Hitler, there were people who strongly resisted getting involved with the world's war. There were strong debates. When the nation was asked to give up things or buy war bonds to support the effort, there was more discussion, more propaganda, a clearer sense of cause and effect (not just vague references to being a "patriot"). See if conservative minded people would be willing to give up driving around their SUVs for the war they love to back. Put your money where your mouth is.

To be sure we're paying for it in other ways. Our nation's military budget is outrageous, and the money that goes into building bombs could just as easily go into providing scholarships for university students or for health care for that matter. We could pay for basic health care easily and not feel the pinch in the number of bombs we made as a nation. So the money is being appropriated, that's for sure. But we're also paying for it in apathy. We're apathetic as a people about this war because we're not personally caught up in it.

And apathy is an expensive product that democracies cannot afford to indulge in.

-- DV


View My Stats