As you may remember, I recently joined the Feminist branch of my university. I've had several interesting meetings about The Vagina Monologues, a Take Back The Night march up fraternity row, tabling for health care and many other things. I like my little group. Sort of.
The problem is, I can't keep my mouth shut. I know some won't view that as a problem, but it generally tends to keep me in hot water. I've come to accept it as a basic function of my personality, and I think I'm not particularly rude or hateful about it. I just state my opinion. Or, when things are particularly galling, I rail against something.
I think I'm sort of the black sheep of the feminist group right now. I don't seem to be able to agree with them on too many things. Most of the time, it's because I think they're a little short sighted. They may be a university group, but they can't seem to see beyond the Student Center sometimes. Typical example of how it happens:
Me: You know, one of the things we could do is make sure that all the pharmacies have Plan B stocked, so that women have access to emergency contraception in this county.
Charismatic Club Leader: University health services has it available for $10.
Me: If you're the spouse of someone at the university, you don't have access to university health services. Or if you're a woman in general in Mon County who is not a college student. What if university students who don't live in the dorms want to go to a pharmacy that is more private in the part of the county they live in?*Crickets chirp and strange stares ensue*
This is one small example. Recently, we've butted heads on two items not related to each other: Hillary Clinton and the use of the word "cunt". See, we have a discussion after every meeting on some preordained topic picked by the Charismatic Club Leader. For one meeting, it was "Hillary '08: Can She Win?"
Apparently I fail as a feminist because I really don't like Hillary Clinton that much. Boy, that brought the hammer down. I had five people trying to tell me at once that she was a wonderful person and would be a wonderful leader. I don't like how she voted on Iraq. I don't think she's so stupid to have believed that Iraq was a real threat to our country. Most regular non-senator people I talked to didn't believe that even when the "intelligence" was laid out. Most non-senator people I know were in favor of more inspections, at least at first.
I was told she had to play politics and prove that a woman could run a military. What the hell difference does it make in saying that about a Republican candidate--that he played politics, he's really such a
nice man in private, so concerned about feminist issues, he just can't say those too loudly, because he has to be
electable first?
So I called shenanigans. If a woman is going to be voted in solely based on the fact that being a woman gives her some kind of unique perception (which was also one of the arguments I got, although we would
never say the same thing about a man), then she damn well better be a loud and proud feminist. She needs to make issues like childcare, healthcare, family leave, equal pay, abortion access and a whole other list of "nonpressing" issues seem like very, very pressing issues.
Otherwise, I'm going to vote for who I think would be the best leader to provide for those issues. And I don't care for her very much. And I don't think it makes me less of a feminist to say so. We don't want men to judge us based solely on our genitals--I don't see why I should be expected to look at women with the same idea.
I also got out of line for suggesting that "cunt" should not be made into a mainstream word of "power", like some homosexuals use "fag" and some blacks use "nigger." I don't think those words give any empowerment at all, other than to those few who actually use them amongst their friends. They are hate words and should die out like hate should die out.
If Charasmatic Club Leader called me a "cuntrag", no matter how affectionately, I'd probably treat her like I would a man who called me that--I'd punch her. Having actually been called cunt in a
nonaffectionate way, I can tell you it would pain and hurt me to hear women taking it on as if it was somehow empowering. Why take on the language of the abuser? Why not kill it out and make new language of your own?
I don't seem to fit in anywhere. At least after I finished my rant on the "cunt" discussion, though, five other people said nearly simultaneously, "Me Too!"
-- Virgil
P.S. I don't want this to turn into a Hillary or feminist bashing or favoring contest, please. I'm just stating my simple opinion, of which, I might add, I'm entitled to hold.